U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service issues notice to prepare an EIS
Dec. 4, 2013 – Continuing the advancement of
the Chokecherry and Sierra Madre Wind Energy Project
through the federal permitting process, Power Company of
Wyoming LLC is submitting a comprehensive Eagle
Conservation Plan along with an application for a
programmatic eagle permit to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service for environmental review and approval.
PCW’s Eagle Conservation Plan is built on a foundation of
years of scientific data-gathering and wildlife
monitoring specific to the CCSM Project site, and is
designed in alignment with the Service’s ECP Guidance and
Land-Based Wind Energy Guidelines. The eagle permit
application will be analyzed in an Environmental Impact
Statement by the Service, according to a Notice
of Intent published in today’s Federal Register.
The permit covers PCW’s first phase of wind turbine
development.
Under the Service’s 2009
Eagle Permit Rule that applies to a variety of
activities, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service may
“authorize the limited take of bald eagles and golden
eagles under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,
where the take to be authorized is associated with
otherwise lawful activities,” such as generating clean,
cost-effective wind energy supplies. The Service approves
permits only when rigorous conditions and requirements
are met, including developing a detailed evaluation of
the risk to eagles, implementing all practical measures
to reduce that risk, and providing mitigation and
compensation in the event of a take — all elements that
will be outlined and proposed within PCW’s comprehensive
conservation plan.
To assist in its preparation of the EIS, the Service is
conducting a 60-day public scoping period, in compliance
with the National Environmental Policy Act. In addition
to accepting comments via mail and email regarding the
scope of the EIS, the Service will hold two
public scoping meetings in Carbon County, Wyo., on Dec.
16 in Rawlins and Dec. 17 in Saratoga.
“PCW has deployed an avian radar system along with
teams of biologists to map where and when birds might use
the landscape in the project area, helping us learn where
to place or not place turbines to help avoid and minimize
risks. We’ve worked with top wildlife scientists to
design advanced conservation measures so we can further
reduce potential risks. We’re proposing to place over
26,000 acres of the best habitat — including areas with
the nation’s very best wind resources — into a
conservation easement where wind development will be
precluded,” said Garry Miller, PCW vice president of land
and environmental affairs. “As a responsible energy
developer, PCW is demonstrating its commitment to the
preservation of eagles by implementing all practical
measures to avoid and minimize potential eagle takes.”
In addition to the Eagle Conservation Plan, PCW is
submitting an avian protection plan containing measures
proposed to avoid or minimize potential impacts on other
migratory birds. PCW has been developing both plans based
on ongoing discussions with the Service since 2010.
The entire CCSM Project of up to 1,000 wind turbines
already has been analyzed by federal officials in a Final
Environmental Impact Statement published by the U.S.
Bureau of Land Management on June 29, 2012. The CCSM
Project site was authorized
in a Record of Decision signed Oct. 9, 2012, by
then-Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar.
The CCSM Project wind turbines are being developed
in two phases. The EIS being prepared by the Service
applies solely to the Eagle Conservation Plan and eagle
permit for PCW’s Phase I Wind Turbine Development of 500
turbines. The BLM is reviewing the Plan of Development in
a separate Site-Specific Environmental Assessment that is
tiered to the project-wide BLM EIS. According to the NOI,
the Service intends to incorporate by reference
information from the BLM EIS into its analysis.
When PCW determines it will proceed with Phase II
wind development, PCW will submit a Phase II Plan of
Development to BLM for environmental review and a Phase
II Eagle Conservation Plan and permit application to the
Service for environmental review. This high standard of
detailed and coordinated federal environmental review is
described in the 2012 BLM Record of Decision, which noted
that the BLM will not issue PCW a notice to proceed to
construction without the Service’s concurrence on Eagle
Conservation Plans.
For more information about the EIS being prepared by the
Service, including how to submit comments, visit http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/wind/ChokecherrySierraMadre/index.html. Public scoping comments must be received by Feb. 3, 2014.
For more information about the Chokecherry and Sierra
Madre Wind Energy Project, including its selection as a “nationally
and regionally significant” renewable energy project,
visit www.powercompanyofwyoming.com.
- XXX -